I'm not sure whether to re-publish the original app that was taken down first, or re-publish the second one with the renamed package-name that was taken down second. There are advantages and disadvantages with either option.
The advantage of re-publishing the original app, is that it has the higher installs count and a longer history (and it would be a nice slap-in-the-face to Brad who started this whole thing by taking that one down). Also, fewer users would have to re-purchase the app, since there are already over 50,000 installs if I remember right, compared to like 5,000 installs with the second one. The disadvantage of re-publishing the original, is that I've already changed the github repository to reflect the new package name. I would need to push an update to change it back, which would affect the other devs currently working on the code.
The advantage of re-publishing the second app, is that it has a higher rating (since the first version published for this one was more developed). Also, it has the same package name as whats in the github repository. The disadvantage is that it has a lower installs count and not as rich a history, since it wasn't up for very long before it got DMCA'd.
What does everyone think? I'm leaning toward putting the original one back up, I think.
Also, what are everyone's thoughts on the free version? Should I keep Trev's app up on Google Play, or remove it and re-publish the original free app? I think Trev's app has a higher installs count. But then it is free, so wouldn't be a huge deal for folks to switch to the other app. The advantage of removing Trev's app and re-publishing the original free app, would be if my account winds up banned again from more bogus DMCA's (not sure if Google has actually fixed the underlying problem yet), then I could simply re-publish on Trev's account again.
What do you guys think?